From Eddie Joe's blog
"we have gone to the dark side"
"those
are the words of a republican representive after the kansas house
approved expanded gaming. he went on to say "an ominous cloud has now
covered kansas, and it will never go away". damn, i wonder what will
happen if it passes the senate. the senate president says they are 20
votes shy of passing the measure.
if the bill passes the senate and is signed by the governor it will
allow for four 'destination' casinos and slots at the racetracks. most
gambling is done by people in the vicinity of the casino. i can hear it
now "pack up the kids, we going on vacation to kansas so we can
gamble". the racetracks have lost money, they will have to figure out a
way to lose added revenue.
the debate on the measure was interesting. opponents said gaming
interest donations swayed some to vote yes. others said those that
voted no accepted money from indian gaming interests. really now, you
mean that legislators can be influenced by outside money?
one representative said we already have gaming, 'the question is
whether or not kansas is going to get any of the benefits'. another
representative said 'we're losing so much money to casinos in missouri
and oklahoma and to the indian casinos in kansas'.
some question the constitutionality of the measure. they say the
kansas constitution approves a state owned and operated lottery. this
is a state owned casino that is managed by someone else. developers
would pay a $25 million fee and invest at least $225 million. they will
get their money back first. if they want to point at indians, maybe
they ought to see that an outside management gets to take theirs off
the top. after the management group makes payouts and takes expenses
out, tribes get to divide what is left. kansas will learn that in a
hurry.
opponents of the bill predict grief from expanded gaming including
addiction. yes that is possible. we know sale of booze
can cause alcoholism. we know the sale of tobacco products can
contribute to cancer. cars are involved in accidents. we sell them
anyway. its all about profit. others say gambling will hurt the poor.
if we are concerned about the poor, then raise the minimum wage. and
provide more opportunities. legislators get raises every year and a
righteous retirement.
it will be interesting to see how this all plays out. expanded
gaming has failed for the past 13 years. some people see that indian
tribes have made a profit from gaming. they want a piece of the
action. if they cant take it from indians, then they will compete for
the gaming dollar.
nevada has casinos side by side. increased competition may provide
better gaming facilities and/or bigger payouts. who knows? maybe the
revenue indians are making will decrease. some tribes are rich, some
arent. the indian bureaucracy swallows up most of the profit. the
kansas bureaucracy will do the same. that leaves the question, how will
the average citizen--indian or kansan--benefit. or not benefit."